Times Group boss Vineet Jain paid himself about Rs 50 cr as remuneration in FY14 and gave truckloads to others too

Charity begins at home, some say. Veritable media mogul Vineet Jain, 50, who holds the position of Managing Director in Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited (BCCL), literally laughed all his way to the bank in fiscal year ended March 2014 after he got an extremely fat, (no, almost obese), remuneration.

'Jain Zen'

26 years into country's largest mass media company, Vineet has made a name for himself for many things but most of all for "steering" BCCL into the money way. Running an ever-expanding business is no child's play and he has done that, I dare say, with elan! In 2014, he finally paid himself one of the biggest salaries in Corporate India history. He paid himself an eye-popping Rs 463,767,952 (Rs 46.37 crore) as remuneration in this year!

My wife, a journalist herself, says what's the big deal in this? "He practically owns the company along with his brother Samir. It publishes The Times of India, kumar. THE TOI, ET, NBT...," she reasons. Nevermind, I am still in awe.

This Rs 46.37 crore remuneration means every day that Mr Jain, who has a MBA in Marketing, spent in FY14 was billed at a staggering Rs 13 lakh for whatever he gave the firm. I can't even earn that amount in one full year. Every day, Rs 13 lakh. For 350 days. Fantastic!

Unlisted Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited (BCCL) as you know is primarily engaged in the business of publication of newspapers. It publishes the highest selling English broadsheet daily in the world, i.e., The Times of India. Apart from this, the company publishes newspapers like The Economic Times, Navbharat Times, Maharashtra Times, etc. It also houses television channels zoOm, Times Now and ET Now. BCCL has subsidiaries which are engaged in the areas of internet, e-commerce, radio, television, out of home, etc.

Let me explain the reason behind my long-lasting awe. From what I gather, BCCL made about Rs 5,700 crore in FY14 year with about 821 crore in net profits. Mr Vineet Jain, by that measure, all by himself got about 5.5 per cent of the company's bottomline. At the absolute level, this Rs 46.37 crore remuneration ranks with the best of the best of the best of the best ...

SAP old hand and now CEO of Infosys, Mr Vishal Sikka thought (and we all did) landed a great deal with Rs 30 crore pay packet with India's most loved IT company. Mr. Anil Manibhai Naik of Larsen and Toubro got about Rs 21 crore in a year. Sun Group promoter and chief executive Mr Kalanithi Maran got Rs 56 crore. Kumarmangalam Birla, who lords over the Birla empire, also got Rs 50 crore. So you see, Mr Vineet Jain is right up there. In that August company of rich men...

Comparisons of Jain's pay with others in the 'Media' industry are virtually pointless. A true Goliath among dwarf davids. India Today Group CEO Ashish Bagga got about Rs 4.4 crore as pay packet last year. BCCL CEO Ravi Dhariwal took home a whopping Rs 11 crore in FY'13 financial year (including performance pay), CEO Rajiv Verma of HT Media earned Rs 4.68 crore in 2012-13 while newly appointed CEO Of Kasturi & Sons CEO Rajiv Lochan is contracted to earn Rs 1.75 crore. Clearly, Mr. Jain is the big daddy when it comes to earning big bucks. He is the undisputed King of kings!

Jain had got Rs 14.90 crore in FY'13 and Rs 14.57 crore in FY'12. What exactly led to his remuneration rising manifold this year is not clear. However, a large part of his Rs 46.37 crore could be in form of 'commissions'. No idea what that was for. If any of you do, give me a shout.

There Are Others

Last year -- that is in FY13 -- the highest paid in the firm was Indu Jain, BCCL, Chairperson -- mother of Vineet and Samir. She was paid Rs 15.56 crore for the period 1st April 2012 to 31st March 2013. This appears to be marginally higher than Rs 15.45 crore paid to her in FY'12. In FY14, the 78-year old Sahu Jain family matriarch received about Rs 155,257,652 = Rs 15.52 crore.

For three years running (atleast), she appears to have adopted the mantra of India's wealthiest man Mukesh Ambani. Reliance Industries Chairman Mukesh Ambani kept his annual salary capped at Rs. 15 crore for the sixth year in a row even as the remuneration of key executives went up. Mr. Ambani has kept salary, perquisites and allowances and commission at Rs. 15 crore since 2008-09, foregoing almost Rs. 24 crore per annum.

Coming back to Samir Jain , the eldest son of late Ashok Jain. The 60-year old, also the Vice Chairman and MD of BCCL, got good money as well in FY14. Clearly, the brothers struck a pot of gold in 2014, the year which will be remembered for having been the stage for Mr Narendra Modi storming to power at the Centre as PM on the back of the strongest mandate from the public in last 30 years. Many, not just me, feel big media played the role of a second fiddle too well in getting Mr Modi at 7 Race Course Road.

Samir took home Rs 375,142,883 or a staggering Rs 37.51 crore as remuneration. The chief architect of BCCL in 1980s, Samir -- famous for being the more spiritually inclined between the two brothers -- had got Rs 15.17 crore in FY'13 against Rs 14.82 crore in FY'12.

The youngest member of the Jain family Trishla Jain, an artist who held the post of executive director, had received Rs 3 crore in FY'13 compared to Rs 2.8 crore in FY'12. In FY'14, thirty something Trishla got about Rs 2.7 crore. About the same in the previous two years. Eleven years into BCCL, Samir's daughter is said to have played a key role in business development. Trishla resigned from company directorship from March 31, 2014.

Satyen Gajwani, Trishla's husband, got about Rs 51 lakh but this doesnt reflect a full-year's pay.

So, all in all, the Jains got over Rs 100 crore as remuneration from BCCL in the fiscal year that has gone by or about 12 per cent of bottomline. The 'family' was paid about Rs 50 crore in FY'13 or loosely 6.5 per cent of standalone profits. Clearly, the rich haul in 2014 is not just from remuneration. The directors recommended a dividend at the rate of 6 per cent (Rs 17.22 crore) on the paid-up share capital of Rs 286.96 crore. Assuming the promoters i.e. Jains hold 90 per cent of beneficial interest in BCCL, that makes it another Rs 15.5 crore in dividend income.

Growing Inequality

BCCL CEO Ravi Dhariwal has retired. Naturally, his pay this year at Rs 5.57 crore reflects that. For the record, he was paid Rs 11.34 crore in gross remuneration (FY'13) compared to Rs 3.4 crore in the fiscal ended FY'12. Dhariwal had a great stint at BCCL after being with the group for more than a decade. Bharti Retail's chief executive Raj Jain has now taken his place. Hope Jain finds solace in the company of more Jains!

Before delving deeper into this ever-widening salary chasm of non-editorial and editoral guys, lets look at some more numbers. Non-editorially speaking. 49-year old Shrijeet Mishra took home Rs 2.9 crore as COO. He has about 25 years of professional experience.

In FY13, Arunabh Das Sharma, Executive Director & President Response, got Rs 2.92 crore. In FY14, its Rs 3.6 crore for the former Whirlpool hand at BCCL. 22 years of experience including 4 in BCCL. Joy Chakraborty, Director-Response (Response is the prime mover among all other media marketing solution providers in India. It just not the advertising department!) received Rs 2.2 crore. Another Director - Response R Sundar took home Rs 2.64 crore in FY14 compared to Rs 1.84 crore in FY13. These are good hikes at good levels.

Lets look at non-editorial VP level salaries in BCCL. Indira Dinesh, Vice President - Response, got Rs 79.25 lakh in FY14 vs Rs 72.80 lakh in FY13. C G Varughase, Vice President - Response, got Rs 78.65 lakh vs Rs 70.39 lakh. Teena Singh, Vice President - Response, got Rs 73.97 lakh vs Rs 66.42 lakh. Jnan Prakash Dsouza, Vice President - Response, got Rs 72.45 lakh vs 62.01 lakh. VP people are guys with 20-30 years of solid experience.

At AVP levels, which is like above 15 years experience, BCCL executives get about Rs 60-89 lakh a year. For example, Diwakar Dadoo, AVP - Brand Capital, got about RS 64.4 lakh in FY14. Kuldeep G Mantry, AVP - MAS, took home Rs 63.19 lakh. At the higher end of the spectrum is 48-year old Rasesh Pushpabadhan Gandhi who got Rs 89 lakh as AVP Response.  

Among other key BCCL businesses, S Sivakumar, CEO - Brand Capital, received a lower Rs 1.66 crore vs Rs 2.01 crore. Also, Ashok Raparia, Director - Human Resources, got Rs 1.13 crore vs Rs 1.40 crore.

Coming to editorial staff now. Jaideep Bose, 51, (Editorial Director - TOI) got roughly Rs 1.9 crore in FY14 compared to Rs 2.45 crore in FY'13. Bose has spent 22 years in BCCL out of the full 28 in the profession with his last employment being with Ananda Bazar Patrika. Some could say top notch-editorial talent at BCCL didn't even earn Rs 2 crore when the largesse is quite clear from non-editorial salaries. Comparing to verticals like Response, Bose, aka Jojo, got 33 per cent less than Arunabh Das Sharma, Executive Director & President Response.

Next up is Rahul Joshi, Editorial Director - ET. His remuneration was Rs 1.39 crore vs Rs 1.34 crore. Joshi is Economic Times' Jojo in a loose sense of the word although Joshi would despise such comparisons. The salary chasm, as I had referred to earlier, now gets wider. Santosh Ramachandra Menon, Assistant Executive Editor, with 21 years of experience, including 6 in BCCL, earned Rs 69 lakh.

Bodhisatva Ganguly, Deputy Executive Editor, got about Rs 68 lakh. Shailendra Swaroop Bhatnagar (Chief Editor-Markets & Research), apparently responsible for Editorial Content during the Morning Band of ET NOW, earned Rs 92.8 lakh in FY14 vs Rs 86 lakh in FY13. Bhatnagar has 19 years of experience and going by his job description, he handles the time when financial markets are alive. Out of the 81 people BCCL has disclosed remuneration details, only 7 are journalists.

A word on salaries of the ordinary journalist. The Aam Journalist. Always getting the short end of the stick. Why? Because he gets the news, not the ad money.

The salaries of big editors in BCCL are actually huge compared to the little guys who actually make the papers happen day after day. Talk about misplaced priorities, barring a select few top journos, when it comes to salaries. Why peanuts to almost everybody when that aam journalist is actually doing the most work?

The theory of a space seller i.e. marketing guys being more valuable is deeply flawed. That space which gets you easily over a crore is the space where yesterday's headline just became archived material. Nobody remembers a paper or a channel by the ads they show, its the news, It always has been 'the news' and it ain't gonna change soon. The crowd puller or the show stopper is news and the news guys.

The Year 2014 That Just Went By

BCCL had a great year from the looks of it. Total income grew about 10 per cent to Rs 5,659 crore. A ten per cent growth kind of year after a marginal rise in FY13 vis a vis FY12 is actually a lot to cheer for. Out of FY14 revenues, sale of publications accounted for Rs 583.25 crores, television distribution revenue about Rs 21.6 crore and the cash-cow, advertisement revenue was about Rs 4,684 crore.

Key takeaways -- both sale of publications and advertisement revenue grew at about same pace of 8-odd per cent year on year. However, BCCL's focus on space utilisation indicates why its after all more of an advertising firm. There's no harm in it. Almost everybody in the market, is trying to copy that ad-first approach. 

This momentum showed up in profits as well. BCCL's bottomline grew to Rs 821 crore in FY'14 compared to Rs 740 crore in FY'13.  

In the print business, during the year under review, its flagship brand, Times of India achieved an overall growth in circulation. The Newspaper in Education (NIE) segment is said to have registered an impressive growth of over 8 per cent as compared to previous year. Economic Times maintained its market share for Business Dailies. The company took a major step forward in languages through launch of Navbharat Times in Lucknow. This launch is supposed to have opened up a significant

opportunity for NBT in the Hindi heartland. 

Maharashtra Times launched two new editions in Jalgaon and Ahmednagar, further consolidating its position in the Western markets with a total of 8 editions. The company recently launched Nav Gujarat Samay, a general interest daily in Gujarati language in the cities of Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar. This launch makes BCCL the only newspaper group to have major publications in 5 Indian languages - Hindi, Marathi, Kannada, Bengali and Gujarati. 

In a challenging business environment for Media industry, newspaper advertising spends grew by only 5 per cent as per Group M report 2014, BCCL achieved a growth of 8 per cent. for the year 2013-14. This is because the company pursued a strategy of growth both in volume and yield. 

In the TV segment, BCCL got good 'response' as well. zoOm channel maintained its viewership share while the segment saw lot of competition. The channel continued to grow on the social media networks and became the first Indian TV brand to cross the 7 million mark on Facebook. In April 2013 zoOm launched a new digital channel on YouTube Telly Talk India which has grown to over 2.3 crore views by 31st March 2014. 

During the year under review, ET NOW continued to remain a good choice of viewers in the English Business News category and dominated the genre. On the content and programming front, the channel continued to add newer formats both during weekdays and weekends, even as it strengthened

its core proposition of market-moving stories and superior stock recommendations based on technical analysis. ET NOW also hosted its first-ever India Economic Conclave, which is a national thought leadership platform meant to spotlight and address key economic challenges facing the country. It was well received by all the stakeholders, including the government, industry and civil society.

During the year a new channel Romedy Now was launched on 22nd September 2013. Romedy NOW is a first of its kind Premium English Entertainment Channel ushering Love & Laughter together for the first time on Television. The channel caters to the Urban affluent audiences across all 8 metros and has established its leadership in a span of just 7 months from its launch.

Also, during the year under review, Times Music continued its leadership in Indian Classical, Devotional, Spiritual and Wellness genres with an impressive turnover. 

Comments/critique all welcome.

Images: Have been sourced from the Internet

Microscope: Looking at Living Media (India Today Group), Performance & Birla's rumored exit

Not many Chartered Accountants have taken a media company to the heights that Aroon Purie single-handedly has. The Lahore-born eminent journalist, who is almost synonymous with those trademark specs and his pink coloured tie, gave shape and firmness to his father Vidya Vilas (VV) Purie's tabloid newspaper called India Today launched in December 1975, the year which witnessed the then PM Indira Gandhi declaring the infamous Emergency. Today, Living Media -- the unlisted holding company of the India Today Group -- is the platform for the Indian media conglomerate which has interests in magazines, newspapers, books, radio, television, printing and the Internet. It has even attracted industrialist Aditya Birla as an investor, who is of late rumoured to be keen on an exit. We take a look at the good, bad and ugly of 'India Today'...

Staring at losses: Birla arrives

Living Media, by its own admission, competes with Bennett and Coleman Company Limited; HT Media Limited; Outlook Publishing (India) Private Limited; Images Multimedia Private Limited; Worldwide Media Limited; Television Eighteen India Limited; New Delhi Television Limited; Media Content & Communications Services (India) Private Limited; Anand Bazar Patrika Private Limited.

Its business segments comprise of the following: 1. Publications - Publishing of various magazines 2. Trading - Sale of merchandise, books, CDs, etc. 3. Distribution - Distribution of external publications 4. ITGOL (India Today Group Online)-Online advertisements and mobile value added services. 5.Others

As earlier said, its promoters are Editor-in-Chief Mr. Aroon Purie, Mrs. Rekha Purie (his wife), Mr. Ankoor Purie (his son), Aroon Purie & Sons (HUF), All India Investment Corporation Private Limited and World Media Private Limited (holds over 50 per cent stake in Living Media). Mr. Aroon Purie has been irrevocably appointed by each Promoter as its representative for certain identified purposes. Besides, individuals with significant influence include:- Ms. Koel Purie Rinchet (Daughter of Mr. Aroon Purie), Ms. Kalli Purie Bhandal (Daughter of Mr. Aroon Purie), Mrs. Madhu Trehan (Sister of Mr. Aroon Purie), Mrs. Mandira Purie Fawcett (Sister of Mr. Aroon Purie) & Mrs. Leela Purie (Mother of Mr. Aroon Purie).

In 2010 fiscal, Living Media reported standalone sales of Rs 348-odd crore. In 2011, this rose to about Rs 375 crore. More importantly, the company swinged to Rs 14.3 crore profit in 2011 from a loss of about Rs 12.2 crore in 2010. The profit in 2011 was more like a fleeting wind. In fiscal 2012, Living Media -- which has its registered office in the upmarket Connaught Circus area of New Delhi although it has shifted significant amount of operations to Noida -- sales came down a bit to Rs 369 crore but the bottomline turned red as it racked up losses (after tax) of Rs 18 crore. 

In 2013 fiscal, Living Media revenues fell further to Rs 341 crore and losses deepened to Rs 26-odd crore. Blame it on the global economy and/or the local economy, the advertising market has been subdued, to put it mildly, in the recent years. Mainly a printer and publisher of magazines, Living Media was under pressure as corporate marketing initiatives were trimmed and ad budgets further snipped. When you have 26 magazines, problems are in dozens. But Living Media is not just another company. It has more. Like in previous years, Living Media did what it could.

It's business in Retail under brand name 'Media Mart' was further consolidated to optimize future market by concentrating more on outlets at Airports, Shopping Malls besides outlets at Metro Stations. Possibility of having outlets in other formats like independent Kiosks, IT Parks, Office Complexes, Educational Institutions etc. were being looked at. This, Living Media management, figured should result in higher volume and consequently increase in top-lines for retail business.

Some more housekeeping was also done. During 2013 fiscal, the company's joint venture agreement dated 1 st December, 2003 with HarperCollins Publishers Limited, UK was discontinued.

To make itself a pure-play media firm, Living Media transferred its Non-Media Undertaking with all assets and liabilities to Thomson Press (India) Limited.

Soon enough, Living Media along-with promoter shareholders entered into Shareholders Agreement (SA), Share Subscription and Purchase Agreement (SSPA), with IGH Holdings Private Limited -- an Aditya Birla Group Company. Pursuant to these agreements, the holding company of Living Media -- World Media Private Limited (controlled by Arun Poorie etal) sold 14,129 equity shares to IGH Holdings Private Limited & Living Media issued 53,798 fresh shares to IGH Holdings Private Limited.

So, the loss-making company got Rs 480 crore at one-shot as it was valued at Rs 1,750 crore by virtue of the price paid by Aditya Birla group firm for getting 27.5 per cent stake. Later, the industrial conglomerate pumped in atleast Rs 70 crore in exchange for more equity (9,784 shares)-- making the total investment upwards of Rs 550 crore.

One may have think why so much of money for Living Media but possibly the answer lies in TV Today Network (worth Rs 320 crore in May 2012) which is listed on bourses. Living Media controls over half (57% odd) of it. Birla-whose aunt happens to be HT Media owner Shobhana Bhartia-was convinced that Living Media is a good play on the "sunrise sector". An IPO dream was floated: the investor told about a public offering within November 2018. In case it didn't happen by then, IGH could hike its stake upto 49 per cent.

Here, I would like to add that the traditional media reports on Aditya Birla group's investment in Living Media seem a bit off the mark. See here and here. They, however, were bang on when it came to reporting the development of Birla asking merchant bankers to explore an exit from Living Media in about 2 years!

How It Lives Media

TV Today Network has channels like Aaj Tak and Headlines Today. In 2012-13, it reported income of Rs 320 crore and profit of Rs 12.2 crore---margin of less than 4 per cent.

Another key subsidiary of Living Media is 64.85% owned Mail Today Newspapers Pvt Ltd. Its a key arm not because it publishes Mail Today newspaper, established in November 2007 in a joint venture with British newspaper Daily Mail. MT's penchant for young talent and young readers --- more often by default than design --- is unique. The management expects the paper to go through a gestation period of 7-8 years, for a country like India. MT is part of a key business plan that was pitched to Birla. Why? Most probably because of its losses and the drag it caused on the group financials/earnings. In 2012-13, it logged sales of Rs 39 crore but losses were at a whopping Rs 29 crore.

Like Mail Today Newspapers Pvt Ltd, Living Media has another key subsidiary e-commerce unit BagitToday.com. As per information, this business racked up over Rs 16 crore in losses in fiscal 2013.

Running the overall business has never been a problem for Mr. Purie. Notwithstanding the large real estate assets which can be mortgaged to take sweetheart loans, the company has always been able to put it's hands on the required working capital. Salaries have been paid on time. Creditors rarely complain. Events held by the group have seen the who's who of the world arrive.

Now comes the secret business plan. The Initial Business Plan for the Financial Years ending 31 March 2013, 31 March 2014 and 31 March 2015 is a rolling three (3) year Business Plan and had been adopted by the shareholders. Complete with projections, the plan was set in motion to be prepared for an IPO.

Living Media's losses in Mail Today and BagitToday.com businesses (including its holding in India Today Retail and India Today Merchandise) alone were Rs 45 crore. Hence, the company promised to take all reasonable measures for increasing the business prospects and profitability of Bagittoday.com Target Business and the Mail Today Target Business.

In the event that either Bagittoday.com Target Business and/or the Mail Today Target Business do not perform in accordance with the projections provided in the Business Plan and the actual average audited EBITDA for the Financial Years 2013, 2014 and 2015 of such Identified Business is lower by seventy per cent. (70%) of the average target EBITDA of such Identified Business for the Financial Years 2013, 2014 and 2015 as set out in the Initial Business Plan, Birla was entitled to trigger an event of strategic sale of either or both of the Identified Businesses at its sole and absolute discretion at any point of time subsequent to 15 September 2015 by issuing a notice to Mr. Purie. So, if at all such event happened -- this was to be after Sep 2015.

So, why does he want to leave so soon? Between May 2012 and now, some things have happened. 1) Modi government stormed to power at the Centre. 2) Shekhar Gupta joined as the vice-chairman of the India Today Group. He resigned from his post as Editor-in-Chief of the Indian Express and moved out officially in June, 2014 after being in the position for 19 years. 3) In an attempt to ensure plurality of news and views, broadcast regulator Trai very recently suggested restriction on political bodies and corporates entering the television and newspaper business.

Update: According to reports, Gupta has quit his position. Will stay on board as editorial adviser. See here.

From an investment perspective, Living Media is as well-placed as anybody. For Aditya Birla, pumping more funds clearly ain't an issue. IGH is empowered to invest upwards of Rs 12,500 crore.

Hasty resignations & salaries

For the year ended 31st March, 2013 Mr Aroon Purie got gross pay of Rs 1.63 crore. Director Anil Mehra got Rs 1.43 crore. Ashish Bagga, Group Chief Executive Officer, got an eye-popping Rs 4.41 crore. Dinesh Bhatia, Group Chief Financial Officer, got Rs 1.42 crore. Oxford educated Kalli Purie Bhandal, designated as Group Chief Synergy Officer, got Rs 1.08 crore. Mala Sekhri, COO Lifestyle Group & Music Today, took Rs 90.13 lakh.

Interestingly, both Bagga and Bhatia apparently had resigned as directors on March 31, 2014 due to what they call "personal reasons" or euphemism for DONT ASK :) Soon after Bhatia got reappointed at an annual package of Rs 1.76 crore plus PF, gratuity, medical insurance etc. However, Bagga--famous for his red trousers-- got reappointed at an annual package of Rs 4.1 crore plus PF, gratuity, medical insurance etc. Did he strike a good deal?

Comparisons of Bagga's pay packet with CEOs of rival media companies are natural. On that count, he seems to be at par. While big daddy BCCL CEO Ravi Dhariwal took home a whopping Rs 11 crore in the last reported financial year (including performance pay), CEO Rajiv Verma of HT Media earned Rs 4.68 crore in 2012-13 while newly appointed CEO Of Kasturi & Sons CEO Rajiv Lochan is contracted to earn Rs 1.75 crore.

As always, feel free to drop your comments/criticism/praise in the "Comment" section below. Till the next time.

Images: Sourced from the Internet. If anybody has any objection to use, please notify and it/they will be removed within 24 hours.

Infy new CEO Sikka and NaMo are similar but N R N Murthy not a Gandhi...

Some part of new Infosys CEO Vishal Sikka ' s early life was spent in Vadodara. That's all that he shares with new Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Yet the two leading men in their own right share much more in common than the just a place. Sikka was brought in by none other than N R N Murthy, who has showed an attached detachment unlike the first family of Indian politics. Read on to know why ...

Before delving into Sikka and Modi, a few words on Murthy. Maverick. Entrepreneur. Monk. He came back when he saw his baby sinking. Can't fault him on that. Improved margins by 200 bps. Cut flab. Retained the people he wanted. Passed the mantle. Left.

Murthy isn't a Steve Jobs. He never set out to be one. He wanted to give Infosys to somebody who would treat the company like it was to be run. Emotions aside. The job of an enterprise is to enhance stakeholder value ethically and financially. He now goes. Gandhis unfortunately have never been able to do that. As Murthy walks into the sun set (for the second time), he can like a father from a middle class family, be happy to hang up his boots. The successor is in place. You have to respect him for that.

IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT TIMING

Sikka and Modi have been anointed as chiefs in about the same time. However, the sands of time don't bind them.

Outsiders - The real Gujarati and the fake Punjabi were immediately labelled as 'outsiders' when they came. Modi lacked the national exposure while the former SAP executive lacks the edge to leaf a services company like Infosys, critics have jumped.

The respective chief executives of the Indian economy and the pioneer of making codes into a money making machine actually have an advantage for being out of the system. Modi's proven administrative abilities as a chief minister are potent as Sikka's being part of a software company. At Infosys, which often deals with implementing products of software companies, Sikka is actually their man on the 'inside'.

Both Modi and Sikka are keen on building their own team. To be honest, if the people they replaced were good...that would not put the newbies outta business. Setting up their own core group and the freedom to do that is what will define their successes.

SPEAKERS WHO ARE GOOD LISTENERS

Sikka, a veritable tech guru, is known for being a cohesive force. Like a glue. A major reason is that he listens. He never has all the answers. To all problems. But the intent to solve the problem is clear. The world where Infosys was born in 1981 is very different in 2014. The company is going through a midlife crisis. Sikka isn't the new fling but  marriage material. If Infosys is not to be sold in parts to the highest bidder, Sikka is the only real chance to do so and fast.

NaMo 's ability to piece together people from different walks of life and ideologies is already a proof of concept. Amit Shah was his choice. I am no fan of Modi. But we have to admit he has been a fantastic leader so far. Cynics listen to him in rapt attention. That's half the job done.

RESPECTED BY OLD GUARD, LOVED BY NEW

Sikka who would be 50 in three years is not by any measure young. Ditto for Modi who is in his sixties. Yet age doesn't matter for them. While Sikka has clearly the blessings of Murthy who built Infosys from scratch, Modi earned his title by proving his mettle where it matters. Critics can argue Nilekani, Kris and Shibulal were also selected by Murthy. Shibulal was a lesser successful experiment to say the least. What guarantee is there that Sikka is not the "old fool's" historical mistake? Many ask. Breaking a tradition makes little sense in a deeply religious country like India, they add.

This can't be farther from the truth. When BJP and Infosys sought to select their future leaders, they went for performance and pedigree. It's that easy. Look at the alternatives inside their institutions and the bias is clear. Sikka is global talent respected and yearned by all and the Sundry. Modi, as I have mentioned earlier,  is an experienced campaigner who has brought glory almost always. Both now would lead two entities that are massive yet open to change.

The rhetorics don't impress India and Infosys anymore. It's time to deliver. Sikka like Modi are the pizza guy at your door.

Till the next time.

Feel free to drop in your views. Look forward to it.